Final report of ITS Center project:  ITS infrastructure maintenance management

A Research Project Report

For the National ITS Implementation Research Center

A U.S. DOT University Transportation Center

ITS INFRASTRUCTURE MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT

 

Principal Investigators:

Jun Yao

Dr. Hualiang (Harry) Teng

Dr. Lester Hoel

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Text Box: Research Report No. UVACTS-15-0-89
December, 2004

 

 

 

ITS Infrastructure Maintenance Management

    By:

                                       Jun Yao

                                       Dr. Hualiang (Harry) Teng

                                       Dr. Lester Hoel

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


A Research Project Report for the ITS Implementation Center

 

Jun Yao

University of Virginia

 

Dr. Hualiang (Harry) Teng

Department of Civil Engineering

Email: hht4n@virginia.edu

 

Dr. Lester A. Hoel

Department of Civil Engineering

Email: lah@virginia.edu

 

 

 

 

 

 

Center for Transportation Studies at the University of Virginia produces outstanding transportation professionals, innovative research results and provides important public service. The Center for Transportation Studies is committed to academic excellence, multi-disciplinary research and to developing state-of-the-art facilities. Through a partnership with the Virginia Department of Transportation¡¯s (VDOT) Research Council (VTRC), CTS faculty hold joint appointments, VTRC research scientists teach specialized courses, and graduate student work is supported through a Graduate Research Assistantship Program. CTS receives substantial financial support from two federal University Transportation Center Grants: the Mid-Atlantic Universities Transportation Center (MAUTC), and through the National ITS Implementation Research Center (ITS Center). Other related research activities of the faculty include funding through FHWA, NSF, US Department of Transportation, VDOT, other governmental agencies and private companies.

 

Disclaimer: The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented herein.  This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation, University Transportation Centers Program, in the interest of information exchange.  The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof.

 

 

 

 

Text Box: CTS Website						          Center for Transportation Studies
http://cts.virginia.edu							    University of Virginia
351 McCormick Road, P.O. Box 400742
Charlottesville, VA 22904-4742
434.924.6362

 

 

 


Abstract

Maintaining Inductive Loop Detection (ILD) systems in good conditions allows the systems to perform the functions they are designed for.  The objective of this study is to identify the factors that influence the life times of loop detection systems and evaluate several fundamental maintenance policies.

To identify the factors that influence the life time of the ILD, survival theory-based deterioration models were developed using the maintenance data collected in a previous study.  Special features of the maintenance data (unidentifiable lifetime, censoring data, and panel data) were taken into account in using the models.  It was identified that heavy vehicle traffic volume is the major contributor to the diminishing life times of loops in an ILD.  No factors can be identified for piezos that are co-installed usually at the same detection stations with vehicle classification capability.

A microscopic simulation model was developed to evaluate three popularly adopted maintenance policies.  To address the effect of preventive maintenance on the performance of ILD, two assumed ILDs with different system compositions were evaluated.  It was found that an ILD without piezos for vehicle classification does not need to be provided with regular preventive maintenance, while the one with piezos installed can be better off with preventive maintenance.


Table of Contents

Abstract iii

Table of Contents. iv

List of Tables. vi

List of Figures. viii

Chapter 1:        Introduction. 1

Chapter 2:        Literature Review.. 6

2.1       Overview of reliability. 6

2.2       Deterioration model 6

2.3       Maintenance decision making. 9

2.4       Observations from literature review.. 10

Chapter 3:        Methodology. 12

3.1       Deterioration Model 12

3.1.1        Basic duration models. 13

3.1.2        Modeling with mixed duration data from two loops in a same lane at one station. 15

3.1.3        Censoring data. 17

3.1.4        Random effect panel data duration model 18

3.2       Deterioration and Maintenance Simulation Model 20

3.2.1        Development of deterioration and maintenance simulation model 20

3.2.2        Evaluation indexes. 25

3.2.3        Sample size determination. 26

Chapter 4:        Calibration of Duration Model 29

4.1       Data preparation. 29

4.2       Model selection. 36

4.3       Software package used in modeling. 37

4.4       Life duration models for loops in Lane 1. 37

4.5       Life duration models for loops in Lane 2. 42

4.6       Life duration models for piezos in Lane 1 (Piezo 1) 45

4.7       Life duration models for piezos in Lane 2 (Piezo 2) 48

4.8       Life duration models for ADRs. 50

4.9       Life duration models for communications. 51

4.10     Summary of modeling results. 52

Chapter 5:        Simulation Evaluation Model 53

5.1       Failure time distributions. 53

5.2       Simulation results. 54

5.2.1        Case 1 (piezoes are not considered) 54

5.2.1.1     Simulation setup. 54

5.2.1.2     Determination of the number of iterations. 55

5.2.1.3     Analysis of the relationship between the performance indexes in Case 1....... 57

5.2.2        Case 2 (piezoes are considered) 66

5.2.2.1     Simulation setup. 66

5.2.2.2     Determination of the number of iterations. 66

5.2.2.3     Analysis of the relationship between the performance indexes in Case 2....... 68

5.3       Summary. 75

Chapter 6:        Findings, Conclusions, Recommendations, and Further Research. 76

6.1       Findings. 76

6.2       Conclusions. 76

6.3       Recommendations. 77

6.4       Suggestions for further research. 78

References.